Custody without sale · request, approve, dispatch, out, returned or gifted · stock type INFLUENCER_POOL at the accountable location · a gift is a write-off with a marketing cost line, never a lost unit
2 holdings past the freeze rung.@zahra.luxe 41d and @trade.show.ae 96d · AED 5,800 at risk · both custodians blocked from new dispatches · the 96d holding is gate-blocking until a human decides gift, write-off or lostDecide now →
Influencer Hub emits nothing yet. All 4 topics are exists_in_hub = FALSE · custody is reconstructed from Shopify order anchors plus the nightly mirror · 4,381 historical deals anchored, 0 treated as customer salesEvent bridge →
Custody state→→→→→TerminalEight states, closed. Terminal reasons come from programmes.terminal_reasons, so a page cannot invent a ninth.
Overdue aging ladder
Automatic rungs. None of them posts a ledger row · the only exit at D+90 is a human decision
5 overdue
D+0 dueDue date reached · no action3AED 4,120
D+3Reminder 1 · WhatsApp to custodian
3AED 4,120
D+7Reminder 2 · WhatsApp + Slack
2AED 3,300
D+14Escalate to marketing lead
2AED 3,300
D+30Freeze custodian · no new dispatches
2AED 5,800
D+60Write-off proposal raised automatically
1AED 1,200
D+90Gate-blocking · GATE-7 will not go green
1AED 1,200
Value dispatched, returned, gifted
AED at frozen landed cost · 12 months · net loss polyline
AED 214K out, AED 138K back
AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarJunJul
DispatchedReturned to stockGifted (written off)Net loss
Custody holdings
22 holdings · one row per (custodian, SKU, allocation) · value at frozen landed cost, so a later cost revision does not rewrite what was at risk
2 frozen5 overdue14 out
Holding
Custodian
SKU
Out
Ret
Open
Loc
Purpose
Dispatched
Due
Age
Rung
At risk AED
State
HLD-INF-2026-00412
TS@trade.show.ae
MIN-CHR-001
1
0
1
HQ_319
trade_show
24-04
08-05
96d
D+90
1,200
held · gate-block
HLD-INF-2026-00438
ZL@zahra.luxe
LBA01
1
0
1
HQ_319
editorial
05-06
19-06
41d
D+30 frozen
4,600
held · frozen
HLD-INF-2026-00461
MS@maryam.style
MSR31-07
2
0
2
HQ_319
editorial
08-07
22-07
21d
D+14
1,498
held · overdue
HLD-INF-2026-00470
NI@noor.interiors
JRY01
1
0
1
HQ_319
shoot
15-07
25-07
14d
D+7
1,549
held · overdue
HLD-INF-2026-00474
LD@layla.dubai
LLW-BAG-047
1
0
1
HQ_319
editorial
18-07
26-07
11d
D+3
890
held · overdue
HLD-INF-2026-00481
MH@mira.home
CDW01
1
0
1
HQ_319
shoot
22-07
05-08
7d
on time
1,400
held
HLD-INF-2026-00483
AC@aysha.curates
FYN01
3
1
2
HQ_319
editorial
23-07
06-08
6d
on time
840
held · partial return
HLD-INF-2026-00488
SD@sara.decor
MIN-VAS-022
2
0
2
HQ_319
press_gift
25-07
-
4d
n/a gift
680
held
HLD-INF-2026-00491
HL@hessa.living
MIN-CNL-019
3
0
3
HQ_319
press_gift
26-07
-
3d
n/a gift
540
held
HLD-INF-2026-00494
FA@fatima.aesthetic
MST-CRM-42-BLK
1
0
1
HQ_319
editorial
27-07
10-08
2d
on time
1,520
dispatched
HLD-INF-2026-00495
AH@amal.home
TNS01
2
0
2
HQ_319
shoot
28-07
11-08
1d
on time
940
dispatched
HLD-TRL-2026-00119
SAStudio Alserkal studio
JAE17
4
0
4
HQ_319
shoot
21-07
04-08
8d
on time
1,680
trial · held
HLD-TRL-2026-00121
CUWalk-in · MCC customer
MSR31-07
1
0
1
MCC
trial
27-07
10-08
2d
on time
749
trial · deposit held
HLD-INF-2026-00498
RM@reem.minimal
BX-MSR31
1
0
1
HQ_319
editorial
-
-
-
n/a
900
requested
HLD-INF-2026-00499
DK@dana.k
FYB01
2
0
2
HQ_319
shoot
-
-
-
n/a
750
awaiting approval
HLD-INF-2026-00402
KD@khadija.designs
MIN-MRR-003
1
1
0
HQ_319
editorial
18-06
02-07
closed
-
0
returned_good
HLD-INF-2026-00396
SS@shereen.styled
MIN-2159
2
2
0
HQ_319
editorial
12-06
26-06
closed
-
0
returned_damaged
HLD-INF-2026-00381
RD@rana.decor
PP02
2
0
2
HQ_319
press_gift
02-06
-
closed
-
0
gifted · POW-2026-00104
18 rows shown of 22 · a gifted holding closes with qty_closed = qty_out, a named approver and both journal rows: WRITTEN_OFF in the quantity ledger and a marketing expense in cost_ledger. Neither posts without the other.
86 in the pool at HQ_319. 31 of those are physically with somebody. 55 are on the marketing shelf. The quantity ledger knows the 86; this page knows the split, and the two are reconciled nightly by v_programme_custody_reconciliation. A row where they disagree drops out of every total until a compensating pair closes it.
An influencer is not a location. Module 04's test decides it: we eat the loss, and HQ_319 is accountable for chasing it, so custody is a stock type at HQ_319 and the person is a custodian. i2 modelled the same fact four different ways and could not answer how many units were out.
A timer never posts. The ladder above is entirely automatic and entirely non-financial. ck_phe_no_robot_writeoff forbids a system actor from gifting, writing off or declaring a unit lost, so v2's 90-day auto-gift is not merely unimplemented, it is impossible.
Pending decisions
3 proposals · AED 6,700
Proposal
Holding
Kind
Qty
AED
Proposed by
State
POW-2026-00118
HLD-INF-2026-00412
abandonment
1
1,200
system:chase
awaiting finance
POW-2026-00119
HLD-INF-2026-00438
abandonment
1
4,600
system:chase
awaiting finance
POW-2026-00120
HLD-INF-2026-00488
gift
2
680
f.marketing
awaiting finance
POW-2026-00117
HLD-INF-2026-00381
gift
2
1,360
f.marketing
posted 26-07
POW-2026-00116
HLD-INF-2026-00375
gift
1
2,400
f.marketing
posted 24-07
POW-2026-00115
HLD-INF-2026-00369
loss
1
890
a.yousuf
posted 21-07
Four eyes: ck_pw_four_eyes refuses an approver who is also the proposer. A proposal raised by system:chase can be approved by anyone with the finance feature, because a cron cannot be the second pair of eyes for itself.
Custodian accountability
Return rate counts only holdings that required a return · the denominator is stated because 6,608 of 6,608 Hub deals are gifts
The pool holds 86 units at HQ_319 and none of them is with anybody. That is a healthy state, not a broken one.
Error
Couldn't load holdings.
The custody service timed out after 8 seconds. Nothing was changed and no ladder rung fired.
inf-hold-91c2 · 29-07-2026 14:32 GST
Permission
Read only.
You can see holdings but not approve a dispatch. That needs role >= manager plus feature programs_approve.
apps.i3.features = [viewer]
Gate-blocked
GATE-7 day 0 of 7.
One holding has been open 96 days with no decision. Closure completeness is 94% and the gate needs every 90-day-old holding resolved. The numbers here are correct; the phase is not yet closable.
KeyboardJK moveEnter open holdingN new requestR mark returnedG propose giftE extend due date/ filter⌘K paletteAll shortcuts ↗